SAA is the Shakespeare Association of America, the conference I went to this past week. I didn't take my computer, so I didn't blog.
Thoughts about SAA?
I had a good time, mostly because I spent time with a friend from grad school who's super nice, smart, and all the things we want friends to be. I also chatted with DG, who I met a couple of years ago.
I heard people saying good things about seminars this year, mostly, more than in most years, it seems. I thought the papers in my seminar were sort of all over the place, but our conversation was really good because it brought together the bigger picture issues well. And many of us had a lovely dinner afterwards.
It was expensive, and none of the grad students came; I wonder if they looked up the restaurant ahead of time and decided they couldn't afford it? One of the plusher folks picked up most of the tab for a couple of others, which was generous. I must admit, I looked at the menu and saw no prices, and was worried--and asked. It was a fixed price for an amazing dinner sort of thing, and delicious, but I don't think I've ever spent as much on a meal before. (And the plusher person was exclaiming about how cheap it was, but then, they live in a very expensive area.)
Before my seminar, I was sitting outside in a nice sitting area (the hotel had REALLY comfy, relatively quiet sitting areas around the meeting room floor, which was great), and a young, white man was talking to another person, who asked if he'd had a good time in his seminar. He expressed disappointment that his paper hadn't been talked about, and the two people who'd responded to him were grad students who didn't know much about the issues he was addressing. He went on to say that famous person 1 and 2 should have been his respondents because they would have known what he was talking about. He went on to say that his dissertation director really isn't an expert in his area, so he really did need that sort of response.
So, on one hand, I'm sort of sympathetic: one always hopes to get helpful responses. On the other hand, I was sort of irritated, too. We all want good responses to our papers, always, and yes, we all tend to be focused on our stuff more than other peoples' stuff. But I would have had more sympathy if he'd expressed the slightest awareness that maybe his paper really wasn't as incredibly important and wonderful as he thought?
I mean, he says he's not working with an expert in the area, so maybe his director isn't pushing him, or hasn't told him that he's behind the times, and the conversation he thinks is super vital was done three years ago or more, done and dusted.
I wish I'd asked him what he learned from famous people 1&2's papers, and I wished I'd asked him what he'd learned from the papers of the other grad students.
The sad part of the SAA, or maybe not, is that I was going to good panels and seminars, and barely got outside. And because of when my own seminar was, I didn't play tourist at all. But I learned stuff!
It seems like a new generation has taken over, and that's quite promising. And in the process, schools that used to be early modern power-houses, with lots of panel presentations and such coming from them, have faded and other schools are coming forward, usually public R1s now. But still, the focus is totally on R1s, of course.
Some previous SAA responses: 2014 in which I talked about some folks who teach doctoral students and the job market.
***
I'm signed up to help with bird banding tomorrow!
Showing posts with label SAA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SAA. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Week 49/66: Back from SAA
Monday, March 28, 2016
Back into the Swing
I'm back from a fabulous SAA! I learned so much! So MUCH!
My seminar had a great conversation; it's absolutely wonderful to get to learn from these folks. And learn I did.
I also saw a really superb Race and Pedagogy workshop, a couple of good panel talks, and met some neat people.
I'm eternally grateful to one of the folks I met; we happened to be heading the same way home, and so were chatting on the airport shuttle. Then at the airport. Our flight boarded, and then there was a mechanical problem. We were deplaned, and (while waiting in line) then got a text from the airline saying that we were being put on a 9:30 pm flight. That would have put me into Minneapolis at about midnight, well after the last shuttle left, leaving me to wait at the airport until after 7am, when the next shuttle left.
BUT, DG came to me in line and pointed out that there was another flight to Minneapolis about to leave, and so I went and managed to get the very last seat.
So, DG knew about this flight, and instead of taking it himself (which he could have done, and who would have blamed him), he sent me over. And I got on and so got home just before midnight. The other way would have left me trashed for work on Sunday, but this way I managed to finish the things I needed to finish to be ready.
Thanks, DG! Eternal gratitude to a scholar and a gentleman in the best senses of the word!
And now, on to all the things.
My next big thing is a Shakespeare concert in mid-April, a collaborative event with a bunch of our music and theater folks! I'm excited!
And then a bunch of people I care about and like are doing recitals, so it's going to be a good month for music!
I practiced my violin yesterday. At first, everything felt so strange, like it was my very first time. And after a bit, I sounded every bit as great as I had before. Which is to say, not great, but getting a little less horribly grinding as I work on stuffs.
***
When I opened the door to my office, I saw that the desk was cleared and everything was much cleaner. And it was like someone had broken in and made my office nice! I forgot until that moment that I'd spent some time early in the break cleaning up when I came in to record the midterm exam grades. That was a nice surprise!
My seminar had a great conversation; it's absolutely wonderful to get to learn from these folks. And learn I did.
I also saw a really superb Race and Pedagogy workshop, a couple of good panel talks, and met some neat people.
I'm eternally grateful to one of the folks I met; we happened to be heading the same way home, and so were chatting on the airport shuttle. Then at the airport. Our flight boarded, and then there was a mechanical problem. We were deplaned, and (while waiting in line) then got a text from the airline saying that we were being put on a 9:30 pm flight. That would have put me into Minneapolis at about midnight, well after the last shuttle left, leaving me to wait at the airport until after 7am, when the next shuttle left.
BUT, DG came to me in line and pointed out that there was another flight to Minneapolis about to leave, and so I went and managed to get the very last seat.
So, DG knew about this flight, and instead of taking it himself (which he could have done, and who would have blamed him), he sent me over. And I got on and so got home just before midnight. The other way would have left me trashed for work on Sunday, but this way I managed to finish the things I needed to finish to be ready.
Thanks, DG! Eternal gratitude to a scholar and a gentleman in the best senses of the word!
And now, on to all the things.
My next big thing is a Shakespeare concert in mid-April, a collaborative event with a bunch of our music and theater folks! I'm excited!
And then a bunch of people I care about and like are doing recitals, so it's going to be a good month for music!
I practiced my violin yesterday. At first, everything felt so strange, like it was my very first time. And after a bit, I sounded every bit as great as I had before. Which is to say, not great, but getting a little less horribly grinding as I work on stuffs.
***
When I opened the door to my office, I saw that the desk was cleared and everything was much cleaner. And it was like someone had broken in and made my office nice! I forgot until that moment that I'd spent some time early in the break cleaning up when I came in to record the midterm exam grades. That was a nice surprise!
Thursday, April 17, 2014
SAA Conversation
I asked some of the folks I know who teach at R1s about their PhD placements. All but one assured me that all of their grads get jobs. One of these folks said that their students get jobs because their PhD students are even willing to go to places such as the U of North Dakota. Yep, in his mind, that's the worst thing possible. My sort of school isn't even on his radar of horrors.
The one who didn't assure me that all their grads get jobs talked about the ethical dilemma of teaching grad students who probably won't get jobs. And yet, he teaches where he teaches because he took the best job offered in a tough market.
Overall, though, the job market difficulty was passingly acknowledge in the presidential address, where Diana Henderson talked about how her connections helped her get a near Ivy job after she didn't get tenure at her first job. It's good to have connections, no?
I know the folks involved would be horrified to realize this, but to me, SAA often feels like an insider crowd from all Ivies or near Ivies, and the rest of us who exist to buy their books and teach at places they don't really quite believe exist.
The one who didn't assure me that all their grads get jobs talked about the ethical dilemma of teaching grad students who probably won't get jobs. And yet, he teaches where he teaches because he took the best job offered in a tough market.
Overall, though, the job market difficulty was passingly acknowledge in the presidential address, where Diana Henderson talked about how her connections helped her get a near Ivy job after she didn't get tenure at her first job. It's good to have connections, no?
I know the folks involved would be horrified to realize this, but to me, SAA often feels like an insider crowd from all Ivies or near Ivies, and the rest of us who exist to buy their books and teach at places they don't really quite believe exist.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
My SAA
Ups and downs.
I was in probably the most useful seminar so far as specific feedback for everyone's papers that I've ever been in. It was really great that way.
I got to see good folks, from grad school and elsewhere, and that was great.
I felt ever more alienated from Shakespeare stuff here in my NWU home, where I teach more comp than early modern by far. But where there are other good things that I appreciate.
I planned poorly, I think, and rushed in and rushed out. The bad in that is that I spent the whole visit tired. The good in that is that I'm home and got a good and full night's sleep last night, and I get to go to a friend's concert tomorrow which I'm very much looking forward to.
I was in probably the most useful seminar so far as specific feedback for everyone's papers that I've ever been in. It was really great that way.
I got to see good folks, from grad school and elsewhere, and that was great.
I felt ever more alienated from Shakespeare stuff here in my NWU home, where I teach more comp than early modern by far. But where there are other good things that I appreciate.
I planned poorly, I think, and rushed in and rushed out. The bad in that is that I spent the whole visit tired. The good in that is that I'm home and got a good and full night's sleep last night, and I get to go to a friend's concert tomorrow which I'm very much looking forward to.
Monday, April 13, 2009
SAA Report
I saw a couple really smart, interesting papers, from just the folks you'd expect. I saw a couple disappointing papers, too, alas.
I saw and visited with friends, and got good news and bad news from and about them. Still, it was great to see the folks I saw.
I visited shortly with my mentor, who is as wonderful, which is a lot.
I met a couple bloggers, which was fun.
I enjoyed my workshop session and got some really good ideas!
And mostly, I went to a few museums and ate really good food.
First off, the reception was at the National Building Museum, and it was beautiful, but I didn't go back because I didn't have time. The food at the reception was yummy, as is always the case with SAA. Let's face it, we eat well.
My first purely fun visit was to the National Gallery of Art. There's something really fun when you walk into a gallery and think, hey, I recognize that face. And then you wonder where you recognize the face from. So, you look, and sure enough it's Cardinal Bembo, whose portrait by Titian is part of lots of editions of Castiglione.
I walked a bit further and found this familiar face, but again, wasn't sure who it was without looking. It's Devereux!
Even I managed to recognize David's Napoleon as Napoleon.
I really like going to a museum for a short visit, choosing a couple paintings to sit with and look at, and then being done. I don't have the mental stamina to look at painting after painting for hours. But, I really enjoy the shorter visit I did, and I did go make a point to see Raphael's and Van Gogh's works. Van Gogh especially, I love the three-dimensionality when I see one of his works in person, but I just don't much get the effect in prints.
So, thanks to Fretful Porpentine (who doesn't seem especially fretful in person, nor does she have nasty quills so far as I could tell), Susan, and Horace for the suggestion!
My next purely fun visit was to the National Museum of American History, which I must admit was a disappointment. First, it was crowded, and I was too impatient (and time-limited) to stand in line for a couple of the exhibits, primarily the Lincoln exhibit. But I liked the "this old house" exhibit, though these seem pretty common these days. And, like almost everything, the focus seemed to be on east coast history, and most especially, east coast history of white northern European folks, with a couple of token Jews in the mix. American Indians have been disappeared, as have almost all African Americans. The history of the west coast doesn't much seem to exist; there are no Russian fur traders or Spanish conquistadors, no French loggers.
I get that it's lots of fun to see Hollywood artifacts, but I really didn't feel like my desire to understand things better was met much at all. One little bit was interesting, an exhibit on the Scurlock photography studio, a studio which focused on photographing African Americans in and around DC. I got to think about the specialty of photographing folks with darker skin, which was something the exhibit talked about in explaining the success of the studio relative to others, and to think about the long history of African Americans in the DC area, especially earlier in the 20th century. So that was well worth seeing.
Horace had also recommended the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, and so after my frustrations with the supposed American History museum, that's where I headed. I gather that it's a contested museum, but I'm not well-enough up on things to understand the contestation. I did enjoy it, especially that it took "American" broadly enough to include peoples of the Americas rather than peoples who happen to live where the United States now controls territory. I really liked seeing the story of contact told more broadly. And I like that they had curators from different indigenous groups telling the story of their own group, and that the museum recognized these curators and showed who they were. That seems important, and would be interesting for all museums, wouldn't it? I mean, wouldn't it be interesting to learn something about the curator of the National Gallery French collection?
That said, I also found some of the exhibits overwhelming; like just a bunch of pieces of gold work on the wall without contextualization that I needed to really undestand it. For example, I saw a piece that looked a lot like an Aztec alligator a friend of mine has done work on, and knowing how much she's worked on the context for that piece, I really wanted to get that from the museum. But instead, it was just a "hey, lots o' gold" sort of display. The same thing goes for the display of human figures.
I also found a small piece of art there, which I could both afford and liked. I'll try to add a picture soon!
So there you are. I went, I stimulated the economy, I saw a few left-over cherry blossoms. I enjoyed walking in the city. I usually really enjoy walking in cities, way more than I tend to enjoy walking in fields or trails. I'm partly ashamed to admit that, but there I am. I like the energy of city walking, I guess.
I saw and visited with friends, and got good news and bad news from and about them. Still, it was great to see the folks I saw.
I visited shortly with my mentor, who is as wonderful, which is a lot.
I met a couple bloggers, which was fun.
I enjoyed my workshop session and got some really good ideas!
And mostly, I went to a few museums and ate really good food.
First off, the reception was at the National Building Museum, and it was beautiful, but I didn't go back because I didn't have time. The food at the reception was yummy, as is always the case with SAA. Let's face it, we eat well.
My first purely fun visit was to the National Gallery of Art. There's something really fun when you walk into a gallery and think, hey, I recognize that face. And then you wonder where you recognize the face from. So, you look, and sure enough it's Cardinal Bembo, whose portrait by Titian is part of lots of editions of Castiglione.
I walked a bit further and found this familiar face, but again, wasn't sure who it was without looking. It's Devereux!
Even I managed to recognize David's Napoleon as Napoleon.
I really like going to a museum for a short visit, choosing a couple paintings to sit with and look at, and then being done. I don't have the mental stamina to look at painting after painting for hours. But, I really enjoy the shorter visit I did, and I did go make a point to see Raphael's and Van Gogh's works. Van Gogh especially, I love the three-dimensionality when I see one of his works in person, but I just don't much get the effect in prints.
So, thanks to Fretful Porpentine (who doesn't seem especially fretful in person, nor does she have nasty quills so far as I could tell), Susan, and Horace for the suggestion!
My next purely fun visit was to the National Museum of American History, which I must admit was a disappointment. First, it was crowded, and I was too impatient (and time-limited) to stand in line for a couple of the exhibits, primarily the Lincoln exhibit. But I liked the "this old house" exhibit, though these seem pretty common these days. And, like almost everything, the focus seemed to be on east coast history, and most especially, east coast history of white northern European folks, with a couple of token Jews in the mix. American Indians have been disappeared, as have almost all African Americans. The history of the west coast doesn't much seem to exist; there are no Russian fur traders or Spanish conquistadors, no French loggers.
I get that it's lots of fun to see Hollywood artifacts, but I really didn't feel like my desire to understand things better was met much at all. One little bit was interesting, an exhibit on the Scurlock photography studio, a studio which focused on photographing African Americans in and around DC. I got to think about the specialty of photographing folks with darker skin, which was something the exhibit talked about in explaining the success of the studio relative to others, and to think about the long history of African Americans in the DC area, especially earlier in the 20th century. So that was well worth seeing.
Horace had also recommended the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, and so after my frustrations with the supposed American History museum, that's where I headed. I gather that it's a contested museum, but I'm not well-enough up on things to understand the contestation. I did enjoy it, especially that it took "American" broadly enough to include peoples of the Americas rather than peoples who happen to live where the United States now controls territory. I really liked seeing the story of contact told more broadly. And I like that they had curators from different indigenous groups telling the story of their own group, and that the museum recognized these curators and showed who they were. That seems important, and would be interesting for all museums, wouldn't it? I mean, wouldn't it be interesting to learn something about the curator of the National Gallery French collection?
That said, I also found some of the exhibits overwhelming; like just a bunch of pieces of gold work on the wall without contextualization that I needed to really undestand it. For example, I saw a piece that looked a lot like an Aztec alligator a friend of mine has done work on, and knowing how much she's worked on the context for that piece, I really wanted to get that from the museum. But instead, it was just a "hey, lots o' gold" sort of display. The same thing goes for the display of human figures.
I also found a small piece of art there, which I could both afford and liked. I'll try to add a picture soon!
So there you are. I went, I stimulated the economy, I saw a few left-over cherry blossoms. I enjoyed walking in the city. I usually really enjoy walking in cities, way more than I tend to enjoy walking in fields or trails. I'm partly ashamed to admit that, but there I am. I like the energy of city walking, I guess.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)