tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17974015.post7817400692836091908..comments2024-03-15T01:11:32.832-07:00Comments on Bardiac: Review: Coriolanus (RSC)Bardiachttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11846065504793800266noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17974015.post-32112672171886778562017-10-18T20:52:07.685-07:002017-10-18T20:52:07.685-07:00Coriolanus is just so... there's a reason it&#...Coriolanus is just so... there's a reason it's not done often.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06748276682730159545noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17974015.post-58572153050647911202017-10-16T06:38:54.549-07:002017-10-16T06:38:54.549-07:00I’ve never liked this play, but I’m playing to see...I’ve never liked this play, but I’m playing to see the broadcast when it shows in my town. After that, I will have seen all the RSC Roman plays this year — two in Stratford and Titus in broadcast. Titus wasn’t very good either but Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra were worth seeing. Both were JC and AC were in togas and they worked well, especially JC. I wrote a joint review of them, having seen them both on the same day. It will be published in Early Modern Culture next year. Anyway, I’m wondering if Coriolanus will be decent in context with the other three shows? I’ll probably try to write something about all four of them after Coriolanus. In my view, JC is the best of all four of these plays and has the most resonance with today’s politics. But taking them as a whole might have something to teach me. We’ll see. <br /><br />Fie upon this quiet life!https://www.blogger.com/profile/12047096700049201873noreply@blogger.com